Plant Physiological Responses to Abiotic Stress for Climate-Resilient Agriculture: An Integrative Review

Authors

  • Yanti Puspita Sari Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia Author
  • Achmad Agung UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67756/jgemr.v1i2.48

Keywords:

Abiotic Stress; Stress Signaling; Redox Homeostasis; Multi-Stress Tolerance; Climate-Resilient Agriculture.

Abstract

Climate change is increasing the frequency, intensity, and co-occurrence of drought, salinity, heat, cold, flooding, and other abiotic constraints that destabilize crop productivity. Because crop failure emerges from physiological dysfunction before it becomes visible as yield loss, understanding plant physiological responses provides a critical bridge between basic stress biology and climate-resilient agriculture. This study used a qualitative library-research design with an integrative thematic synthesis of 35 peer-reviewed references, emphasizing recent literature while retaining foundational studies required to explain core mechanisms. Literature was organized around five analytical themes: stress perception and signaling, water relations and gas exchange, photosynthetic and metabolic stability, ionic and redox homeostasis, and recovery/acclimation under single and combined stresses. The synthesis shows that abiotic stresses differ in their primary injuries but converge on a limited set of physiological bottlenecks: loss of cellular water status, stomatal and mesophyll limitations to CO₂ diffusion, disruption of photosystems and respiration, membrane destabilization, ion imbalance, excessive reactive oxygen species, and altered source–sink relations. Resilient plants avoid catastrophic failure through coordinated stomatal regulation, root-system plasticity, osmotic adjustment, ion exclusion and compartmentation, antioxidant defense, heat-shock and cold-acclimation programs, hypoxia responses, hormonal crosstalk, and stress memory. Importantly, responses to combined stresses cannot be predicted by simply adding single-stress responses; the dominant stressor, stress sequence, developmental stage, and genotype can change both the direction and magnitude of acclimation. For climate-resilient agriculture, the most promising translation is therefore not selection for a single stress marker, but physiology-informed breeding and management that target yield stability, water-use efficiency, photosynthetic persistence, recovery capacity, and multi-stress tolerance. Integration of high-throughput phenotyping, genomic breeding, CRISPR-based editing, beneficial microorganisms, biostimulants, priming, and climate-smart crop management can accelerate the conversion of physiological knowledge into field resilience. The review concludes that future research should prioritize realistic stress combinations, recovery dynamics, reproductive-stage sensitivity, genotype-by-environment interactions, and field validation of mechanistic traits.

References

Apel, K., & Hirt, H. (2004). Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 55, 373–399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701

Bailey-Serres, J., Fukao, T., Gibbs, D. J., Holdsworth, M. J., Lee, S. C., Licausi, F., Perata, P., Voesenek, L. A. C. J., & van Dongen, J. T. (2012). Making sense of low oxygen sensing. Trends in Plant Science, 17(3), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.12.004

Bailey-Serres, J., Parker, J. E., Ainsworth, E. A., Oldroyd, G. E. D., & Schroeder, J. I. (2019). Genetic strategies for improving crop yields. Nature, 575, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1679-0

Bailey-Serres, J., & Voesenek, L. A. C. J. (2008). Flooding stress: Acclimations and genetic diversity. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59, 313–339. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092752

Chen, K., Li, G. J., Bressan, R. A., Song, C. P., Zhu, J. K., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Abscisic acid dynamics, signaling, and functions in plants. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 62, 25–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12899

Chen, X. X., Ding, Y., Yang, Y., Song, C., Wang, B., Yang, S., Guo, Y., & Gong, Z. (2021). Protein kinases in plant responses to drought, salt, and cold stress. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 63, 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13061

Ding, Y., & Yang, S. (2022). Surviving and thriving: How plants perceive and respond to temperature stress. Developmental Cell, 57(8), 947–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2022.03.010

Dinneny, J. R. (2019). Developmental responses to water and salinity in root systems. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 35, 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100617-062949

Gupta, A., Rico-Medina, A., & Cano-Delgado, A. I. (2020). The physiology of plant responses to drought. Science, 368, 266–269. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz7614

Jiang, Z., van Zanten, M., & Sasidharan, R. (2025). Mechanisms of plant acclimation to multiple abiotic stresses. Communications Biology, 8, 655. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-08077-w

Jiang, Z., Zhou, X., Tao, M., Yuan, F., Liu, L., Wu, F., Wu, X., Xiang, Y., Niu, Y., Liu, F., Li, C., Ye, R., Byeon, B., Xue, Y., Zhao, H., Wang, H. N., Crawford, B. M., Johnson, D. M., Hu, C., ... Pei, Z. M. (2019). Plant cell-surface GIPC sphingolipids sense salt to trigger Ca2+ influx. Nature, 572, 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1449-z

Jing, Z., Liu, N., Zhang, Z., & Hou, X. (2024). Research progress on plant responses to stress combinations in the context of climate change. Plants, 13(4), 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13040469

Jung, J. H., Barbosa, A. D., Hutin, S., Kumita, J. R., Gao, M., Derwort, D., Silva, C. S., Lai, X., Pierre, E., Geng, F., Kim, S. B., Baek, S., Zubieta, C., Jaeger, K. E., & Wigge, P. A. (2020). A prion-like domain in ELF3 functions as a thermosensor in Arabidopsis. Nature, 585, 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2644-7

Kopecká, R., Kameniarová, M., Černý, M., Brzobohatý, B., & Novák, J. (2023). Abiotic stress in crop production. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(7), 6603. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076603

Leakey, A. D. B., Ferguson, J. N., Pignon, C. P., Wu, A., Jin, Z., Hammer, G. L., & Lobell, D. B. (2019). Water use efficiency as a constraint and target for improving the resilience and productivity of C3 and C4 crops. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 70, 781–808. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040305

Ma, Y., Dai, X., Xu, Y., Luo, W., Zheng, X., Zeng, D., Pan, Y., Lin, X., Liu, H., Zhang, D., Xiao, J., Guo, X., Xu, S., Niu, Y., Jin, J., Zhang, H., Xu, X., Li, L., Wang, W., ... Chong, K. (2015). COLD1 confers chilling tolerance in rice. Cell, 160, 1209–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.046

Ma, Y., Freitas, H., & Dias, M. C. (2022). Strategies and prospects for biostimulants to alleviate abiotic stress in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 1024243. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1024243

Ma, Z., Hu, L., & Jiang, W. (2024). Understanding AP2/ERF transcription factor responses and tolerance to various abiotic stresses in plants: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(2), 893. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25020893

Mishra, N., Jiang, C., Chen, L., Paul, A., Chatterjee, A., & Shen, G. (2023). Achieving abiotic stress tolerance in plants through antioxidative defense mechanisms. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1110622. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1110622

Notununu, I., Moleleki, L., Roopnarain, A., & Adeleke, R. (2022). Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on the molecular responses of maize under drought and heat stresses: A review. Pedosphere, 32(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(21)60051-6

Pandey, P., Ramegowda, V., & Senthil-Kumar, M. (2015). Shared and unique responses of plants to multiple individual stresses and stress combinations: Physiological and molecular mechanisms. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, 723. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00723

Sharma, M., Kumar, P., Verma, V., Sharma, R., Bhargava, B., & Irfan, M. (2022). Understanding plant stress memory response for abiotic stress resilience: Molecular insights and prospects. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 179, 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.03.004

Shelake, R. M., Kadam, U. S., Kumar, R., Pramanik, D., Singh, A. K., & Kim, J.-Y. (2022). Engineering drought and salinity tolerance traits in crops through CRISPR-mediated genome editing: Targets, tools, challenges, and perspectives. Plant Communications, 3(6), 100417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100417

Sugumar, T., Shen, G., Smith, J., & Zhang, H. (2024). Creating climate-resilient crops by increasing drought, heat, and salt tolerance. Plants, 13(9), 1238. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13091238

Takahashi, F., Kuromori, T., Urano, K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (2020). Drought stress responses and resistance in plants: From cellular responses to long-distance intercellular communication. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 556972. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.556972

Takahashi, F., Suzuki, T., Osakabe, Y., Betsuyaku, S., Kondo, Y., Dohmae, N., Fukuda, H., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (2018). A small peptide modulates stomatal control via abscisic acid in long-distance signalling. Nature, 556, 235–238. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0009-2

Tardieu, F., Simonneau, T., & Muller, B. (2018). The physiological basis of drought tolerance in crop plants: A scenario-dependent probabilistic approach. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 69, 733–759. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040218

Van Zelm, E., Zhang, Y., & Testerink, C. (2020). Salt tolerance mechanisms of plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 71, 403–433. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100005

Wu, F. H., Chi, Y., Jiang, Z., Xu, Y., Xie, L., Huang, F., Wan, D., Ni, J., Yuan, F., Wu, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Ye, R., Byeon, B., Wang, W., Zhang, S., Sima, M., Chen, S., Zhu, M., ... Pei, Z. M. (2020). Hydrogen peroxide sensor HPCA1 is an LRR receptor kinase in Arabidopsis. Nature, 578, 577–581. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2032-3

Yang, Y., & Guo, Y. (2018). Unraveling salt stress signaling in plants. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 60, 796–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12689

Zhang, H., Zhao, Y., & Zhu, J. K. (2020). Thriving under stress: How plants balance growth and the stress response. Developmental Cell, 55, 529–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2020.10.012

Zhang, H., Zhu, J., Gong, Z., & Zhu, J. K. (2022). Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nature Reviews Genetics, 23, 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-021-00413-0

Zhang, J. Y., Li, X. M., Lin, H. X., & Chong, K. (2019). Crop improvement through temperature resilience. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 70, 753–780. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100016

Zheng, Y., Wang, X., Cui, X., Wang, K., Wang, Y., & He, Y. (2023). Phytohormones regulate the abiotic stress: An overview of physiological, biochemical, and molecular responses in horticultural crops. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 1095363. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1095363

Zhu, J. K. (2016). Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell, 167, 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Plant Physiological Responses to Abiotic Stress for Climate-Resilient Agriculture: An Integrative Review. (2026). Journal of Global Education and Multidisciplinary Research, 1(2), 35-54. https://doi.org/10.67756/jgemr.v1i2.48